Wildlife Conservation: Threat Perception between Them and Us

One-Sided Story

In spite of periodic failures, the tiger population in recent times has begun to rise. This seems to be a continuing phenomenon despite many wild souls dying because of human apathy or natural causes. If the reports are to be believed, the leopard population in MP and a few other states seem to be on the rise. This rise is difficult to understand since the predator is constantly being killed at the hands of poachers and as a victim of man-animal conflict. Anyway, let's keep our fingers crossed.  

Poaching is purely a crime, and cannot be dragged under the banner of man-animal conflict. The killing of tigers and leopards by man and vice versa is perplexing since both subscribe to a food chain that is not directly in conflict if the ban on hunting wild animals is taken into consideration. 

While the death of a predator rarely causes much alarm, the death of a human being is reactive and often creates extreme upheaval within society. The browbeating that takes place often bends the system responsible for the protection and conservation, it is unfavorable towards the perpetrator and thus it is victimized to no end. It is either incarcerated or translocated to unfamiliar domains or at worst some trigger-happy elites are invited to shoot it down. This is an ongoing phenomenon, and the besieged animal is hardly able to comprehend the punishment accorded to it. Animals do not kill humans since for many we are not part of the food chain. They fear man and shun proximity. 

Threat Perception the Biggest Threat          

Threat perception is a natural phenomenon among the living akin to the response to external stimuli. Both are victims of the fear of the other and when this happens in extreme both kill. This is making wildlife conservation a difficult proposition, especially in a country like India. Heavily populated, extremely poor, and thrust closer to the wilderness by livelihood pursuits the man-animal conflict is much aggravated by biotic factors. Agriculture in the land that previously was part of the prevailing ecosystems and livestock incursions increase proximity between humans and predators. In spite of policies that make translocation possibly the ground reality has not changed much. This is due to the slow execution of translocation of the human population from vital core due to political infringements, court cases, and on many occasions overzealous NGOs?     

Translocation promises to eliminate human interference in the core while there is no policy to translocate population from immediate surroundings or the outer ring which we call the buffer. 

Creatures having lost their erstwhile homelands and food unwittingly transgress into what has become  human domains. They are killed, maimed or incarcerated brutely.     

This has become a regular tamasha in India with newsmakers worsening the situation with their greed and prejudice towards other life forms. Videos and images of predators being hounded out by lunatic hordes are propagating a wrong message among the people and making us subject to ridicule overseas. We nowhere can boast of the conservation ethos promoted by the ancient Vedas anymore.   

Clearing, wildlife corridors, thinning out the population in the buffer zones, and stopping linear infrastructure build-up which intersects our reserves is a near impossibility since the threat perception ails political dispensations too making them chicken out. Anyway, politicians in India have all to lose from unhappy voters but not from the predators as they have no right to vote. We are enamored by unbridled development as well and thus critics should not leave us out, especially the urban lot. 

Animals kill humans because of threat perception and most often proximity aggravates. Humans have all the comprehending power not to fall victim to a threat posed by a predator in proximity since that has been the case for ages.     

While we should not kill wild animals and do so only under extreme danger we have the ability to mitigate such instances. Wild animals on the other hand rarely cross over their domain but it does happen and at times humans are killed or maimed. Those who are in favor of extreme action against such killers are doing a disservice to mankind since all life forms are vital for an environmental balance upon which our well-being is maintained. 

Hence like automobiles kill people by accident so do animals in unavoidable circumstances. We cannot eliminate both. Hence answers have to be found beyond the ongoing rhetorics and the clash between the two should be mitigated. Translocation of populations that have ingressed is only one such answer another solution is to develop a code of conduct that will aid in minimizing conflicts. These are the imperatives that our planners have to incorporate and execute with sincerity if an environmental balance has to be maintained and our heritage wealth to be conserved. Legal laxity as regards wildlife crimes should be taken care of as well.       

The Youths Take Over

Rhetoric never works and there has to be an action on the ground. Thankfully in our country, the youth is taking interest in ecological matters, and a number of committees or societies have been formed pan India to discourage practices that go against nature conservation. The impact is visible in the interest shown in the conservation, the rising number of PILs, and write-ups against haste. This collective effort is certainly going to keep the establishment on its toes. This will force the policymakers to rethink as well. 

The next-gen is going to be much more nature aware but what do we leave for them?    

==========================

Uday freelances as a naturalist and loves to write about tiger conservation and the environment.

He also provides SEO and Content and teaches  Digital Marketing in his hometown Jabalpur. 

Contact: 

pateluday90@hotmail.com

9755089323

Conservation: It's Pay Back Time

Our  Earth: A Saga of Exploitation

Not only extensive farming, poaching, wood logging, and hunting have denuded our wilds we conveniently seek to forgive our sins whence it comes to breakneck industrial revolution and urbanization. Like agriculture, large industries and industrial estates scrap off nature from Earth in long strips along with associated urbanization in our towns and cities. 

In the past few centuries, we have hastened the demise of many invaluable ecosystems to alternate them with nonviable human constructs and the process goes on. The developed countries have been quick to extensively exploit natural resources and strip off ecosystems forests, grasslands, and rivers to name a few in order to develop in material terms without digging deep into ramifications. Most countries are stripped of natural lands and they have virtually exterminated their wilderness. But there is no looking back,  and if there is at places it is weak and without commitment. As a consequence, we are facing climate change and species extinction due to the dismembering of remaining ecosystems, pollution, human intrusions, and alternating natural systems to suit our exigencies.             

Earth is supposed to be shared among trillions of life forms thus maintaining an equilibrium so that life sustenance mechanism remains inviolate. Large chunks of ecosystems have been decimated for crops without any circumspection, and industrialization, and urbanization is taking place with haste. We are turning settlements into cement jungles and urban ghettos. 

All we look at is modern infrastructure and the gleaming societies and lifestyles they generate forgetting the dead that lies beneath. The industrial revolution has been a major disaster and caused wars innumerable, social disparities as well as grave harm to the environment. Global warming is an evident phenomenon among even those who are not erudite or aware, and the suffering is taking a toll in terms of health physical and mental.   

It is difficult to hinder this blitzkrieg because dispensations do not bow down and at the most pay lip service to conservation. Maintaining an equilibrium would require some committed steps for preservation even if the infrastructure buildup is halted. We simply cannot regenerate the complex living systems that nature does. This is rabid development is the trend everywhere, and most vicious in overpopulated countries trying to emerge from ongoing poverty without understanding the route they are adopting. As urban ghettos increase poverty will as well for we see life not as sustainable but gauge impoverished societies keeping the yardstick of measure highlighting disparity with those well developed (sic). There is no limit to the demands of humanity, and we will perish if we fulfill them at the cost of nature. Are we going to need artificial glass bubbles with oxygen supplies to survive on Earth in the future?       

To keep industries alive and the economy booming we continue to exploit natural resources which are already dwindling. In economic haste, we are not using the resources in a judicious manner, and are not at all looking for renewable on a war footing. Development is the mantra of disaster and the infrastructure built up in hinterlands in countries like India is a scourge with no mitigation seemingly possible. Rather than judging the economy by scale, we must peep into the environmental disaster we are leaving in the wake. We need to define our basic needs and stick to them.         

Poverty alleviation should not come about through the industrial revolution, it should come by rational use of renewable energy and a paradigm shift in our lifestyles. Too much energy consumption or unprecedented use of natural resources has wreaked havoc on our planet and we need to stem the rot. The major stress factor is not poverty but our excessive consumption of fossil fuels and other natural resources. Controlling the population is wise but there is no such urgency among various countries and demographics. Population control should be imperative, especially in Asia and Africa.         

Time to Pay Back 

We need reforestation, conservation of wildlife, habitat repair, and preservation of the ecosystem that supports them, and to stop the destruction of tropical forests going on on large scale.  We will have to redefine our lifestyle and consumption pattern and wean out what is unsustainable with vigor and commitment.     

We will have to have a methodology in place as far as industrialization and infrastructure build-up is taking place. We will have to draw out sustainable plans and practices which mitigate damage to natural lands.  Yes a lot more has to be done in order to preserve our  Earth and the efforts should come about not only from institutions but we the public as well.  

We can do it, we are successfully saving the tiger and the lion and many other endangered species and India has also preserved good enough ecosystems. There is hope! 

========================

Uday Works as Freelance Naturalist and Blogs on conservation, tigers, environmental issues.

He also provides SEO and Website Contents in English.

He can be contacted at:

Mail: pateluday90@hotmail.com

 Mob: 09755089323

    

Tiger Conservation and Locals - PAs - A Paradigm Shift!

On popular platforms, some expert writers, advocates, bloggers, and NGOs time and again suggest vociferously the greater involvement of the local communities in the conservation of our precious ecosystems i.e those remaining. Ironically what they mean is to do away with the protected area system...that has successfully shaped conservation in India, and brought many species out of extinction. Little do they know that the local communities in many instances have unintentionally damaged the natural lands and have brought many species onto the brink of extinction. Our small tiger reserves are a shameful example of land shrunken drastically due exploitation of forests by an ever-growing population of humans and subsequent denudation.

Tiger

Swamp Deer

The threat perception is real and their (authors/advocates) understanding of species survival is at best limited, and they have no cognition of critical habitats and or protected areas that should and must remain inviolate. 

We need thinkers, policymakers, and activists who understand the predicament that other life forms are facing in this human-centric World. Conservation management is scientific, bound by rationale and not by emotions, and in the present context certainly not by human history. 

PA concept is not at all elitist or discriminatory as many would advocate, it is based on scientific rationale and most important it provides succor to other life forms, and does away with omnipresent human footsteps considering the massive population bulge we have in this country. The sore point for some is that it facilitates tourism which many consider elitist without giving a thought to the conservation impetus it creates among the masses and the revenue and much-needed employment it generates among the locals. In years of its popularity, the ecosystems have benefited from regulated tourism and should now be an issue of least concern.   

The forests for example were always pristine and literally inviolate since the population span was contained in the centuries gone past. Not so in contemporary times whence the population span has expanded beyond means and hardly any space for the survival of species is left inviolate. If this had not been the case the concept of a protected area would have not come into the picture at all. The PAs are certainly required now and delimiting would prove to be disastrous, especially in the case of animals like the swamp deer and the tiger.     

Well to be honest not only the locals but many of us irrespective of the location of the domain have also contributed to extensive damage to our ecosystems. The locals have contributed their share of destruction by tilling few remaining natural lands and creating immense biotic pressure through livestock rearing in an unscientific manner. Their involvement in poaching though not on large scale cannot be negated either. This is certainly not a spirit of coexistence a favorite phrase used by the enlightened who consider local communities as still living in a stone age. The local communities have undergone a paradigm shift during this century and look forward to being a part of the mainstream.  The next gen is certainly headed for the urban surroundings as no suitable or alternative source of income exists for the erudite in the remote surroundings. 

The NGOs or some of these writers/researchers have conjectured a picture of tribal in their minds of a static, lifeless, assemblage of flesh and bones, who will remain fixed to a time long gone past and be immobile forever. The local communities are evolving too and need to assimilate the way the whole country is doing. They do not wish to remain stuck in the past living in isolation.  They do not wish to be pushed deeper into the inaccessible wild realms with no infrastructure and modern facilities.

Tribal - Neeraj Vegad

Most of those who write on this subject have no understanding of issues pertaining to conservation as a holistic model and are keen to provide a panacea through their emotional taglines. Many of those who understand this issue are bound by their own emotions which ends up restricting their perspective and miss the imperative.  They are not aware of conservation practices being pursued by the wildlife managers and they certainly do not know about the scientific approach that lies behind the involvement of local communities in and around our tiger reserves to be more precise. Just the flair for writing is not enough a writer should have an in-depth understanding of the topic before holding the pen.  

We have to understand that conservation in our country has two facets, one is the human conundrum which now includes the indigenous communities, and the second is the ecosystems and wildlife within. We are ruthless whence wilderness creeps into our urbanity but wish to share a large chunk of ecosystems belonging to other life forms. Hence the two are now separate entities and the spirit of coexistence is limited to the live and let live principle. Coexistence cannot take place by sharing the tiger reserves or National Parks with local communities. These ecosystems will remain inviolate and strictly. On the contrary, more inviolate space will have to be allocated specially for the conservation of endangered animals like the tiger, Asiatic Lion, swamp deer, and more.   

Till so-called experts do not accept the separation of the two entities mentioned above, the fate of the big cats and the tribal will remain precarious.
========================================
Uday works as a naturalist and loves to blog on conservation.
He can be contacted at:
pateluday90@hotmail.com 

Tiger Conservation The Human Conundrum

This period of April and May were months of extreme upheaval in India as the nation was embroiled in a contentious parliamentary poll. The largest democracy naturally conducts the largest exercise at the hustings. The highlight of parliamentary elections in the country was of course the virulent campaigns that began and ended with unending fervor. The aftermath ended in a reverberating but gradually quietening atmosphere as the results were declared and winners took their seats.

For all political parties in India the propaganda revolves around many populist issues, but completely neglects the conservation and environmental issues though as a matter of principle they are ingrained in our policies albeit executed with scant regard.

The first to inculcate the order of nature and wildlife conservation in India where the Vedic literature, but we have conveniently forgotten them, the scientific journals have been relegated to the background as forgotten and inconsequential parts of our history.

The conservation ethos were carried forward by Asoka the Great, and after centuries of continuous destruction, we had a leader in Smt. Indira Gandhi rejuvenated conservation practices by inducting laws that mattered. The tiger and the ecosystem as a whole were the major beneficiaries of steps taken during her governance. Her zealous pursuit of protecting India's heritage was effective in conserving whatever was left. But after her sad demise no one stepped into her shoes. 

In midst of the mind-boggling exercise, one issue as always took a complete back seat for nowhere was there a mention of environment and nature in a country where multitudinous masses live. All through the campaigning, there was the worst kind of slander that included personal jibes, insults, and revelations all at the lowest level possible.

Forget about the environment and our remaining natural heritage no issues of serious nature were ever brought forth or discussed. That is how the prospects irrespective of their drawing treat their subjects - gullible, downtrodden, ignorant, and living in the stone age. The appeal for the vote is more of a tamasha, steeped in loud promises of piquant favors, charismatic chest-thumping, and yes development.   

After the hustings, all promises are forgotten except the development mantra which all parties think will offer a permanent majority in the parliament for decades. All the time the mantra of development was aimed at more than one billion people a promise if rightly fulfilled could lead to betterment of living conditions and emancipation from abject poverty the large populace is steeped in.   

The goggle-eyed voters could understand the mantra of development very well but the related issues were not even in the picture. The emancipation that was promised was all that mattered - a panacea for all that ails society.

Where would the succor come from with deteriorating climatic conditions, abject shortage of water, and a badly polluted environment without the proper mix of air? The water shortage is a serious matter that should concern one and all especially those at the helm of governance.

We are constantly hurting our ecosystems (rivers, forests, deserts, grasslands) that deliver clean and fresh air, large tracts of forests are being decimated for linear development for highways, settlements and infrastructure expansion. Mining woes are not being mitigated at all. Environmental clearances are taking place in a jiffy with no serious thought to impending disasters, industrial belts and deadly polluting mega industries are taking their toll in this country with ever-increasing haste.

Species endangerment is taking place in the blink of an eye. A large number of species have already been lost. Does all this not matter? Aren't the participants of the democratic process the citizens not entitled to enlightenment as to what safeguards are being put in place that would prevent further depredation. Should not they be revealed during the poll propaganda? Who bothers? 

Human-centric development has always been the core practice of ruling polities with abject disregard for nature. This has been a global phenomenon and cuts across the vast spectrum of political establishments everywhere. India is not alone in this disastrous way of governance, we are in tandem with the World.

But ironically this does not alarm us. Nature is our life support system but we have taken it for granted. A denuded patch of forest does not raise eyebrows as it should hence climate change in its worst form is imminent.

A radical shift has to take place among the rulers as to how development and urbanization should be carried out. All the hindrances which are genuine should be respected and alternatives found. You cannot write off a strip of forest just to aid a highway or an industrial area. But this is happening and slowly we are destroying our green lungs and precious habitats which will augur climate change to the extreme.

The effect of our haste will result in an environmental condition that would make species survival  (including man) extremely difficult. The tiger has been the worst sufferer being an indicator species sitting at the top of the food chain we cannot let it go. Proper development policies without damaging the ecosystems, and keeping in mind the environmental consequences are imperative we should change over to.

For every step we take towards so-called development we have to keep its impact on nature all the time. The institutions in India will play a major role in safeguarding our environment in times to come. Provided there is the necessary radical shift in our perspective and a less destructive paradigm sets in. 

The public should play an important role as a watchdog and be conscious about social ills like exponential population growth which has to be brought down. Not only as tourists, but we should also reduce the biotic pressures on our surroundings in day-to-day living with a responsible lifestyle.

===========================
Uday works as a naturalist at Kanha National Park in India.
He often writes on conservation issues as a blogger.
He can be contacted:
pateluday90@hotmail.com
09755089323